LAUNCHDECKTWO VS ALBERT.AI

Flat-rate autonomous execution vs $10K+/mo managed enterprise.

Albert.ai pitches managed-service autonomy behind a $2M-ICP contract and a 15–22% spend share. LaunchDeckTwo ships the autonomy direct, on a flat rate. Here's the side-by-side.

AXIS 1 — PRICING
HOW LAUNCHDECKTWO IS PRICED

LaunchDeckTwo

Flat monthly rate. Same price at $5K/mo spend or $500K/mo spend. No revenue share, no minimum ad budget.

ALBERT.AI PUBLISHED PRICING

Albert.ai

15–22% of ad spend with a $10K+/mo floor — a $2M-ICP managed-service contract. Pricing scales with the budget you run.

VERDICT

LaunchDeckTwo: flat.

Albert: scales with the spend you give it.

AXIS 2 — AUTONOMY
HOW LAUNCHDECKTWO RUNS

LaunchDeckTwo

Reads performance, shifts budget, ships creative variations — runs unchanged, exits the cycle with no human in the loop.

HOW ALBERT.AI OPERATES

Albert.ai

Managed-service model — every budget reallocation routes through Albert's strategist team before it ships.

VERDICT

LaunchDeckTwo: unattended.

Albert: human-in-the-loop managed.

AXIS 3 — AUDITABILITY
LAUNCHDECKTWO'S AUDIT LOG

LaunchDeckTwo

Every optimizer move lands in the audit log — from-campaign, to-campaign, amount, reason.

ALBERT.AI DECISION LINEAGE

Albert.ai

Decisions are reviewed by Albert's managed team — the customer sees outcomes, not the decision lineage behind them.

VERDICT

LaunchDeckTwo: per-decision trace with a 30% shift cap.

Albert: black box.

BLACK-BOX DECISIONS, FLIPPED

Albert's customers get quarterly reviews of outcomes. LaunchDeckTwo customers get the move trail.

Albert's customers get quarterly reviews of outcomes — not the move-level trail of what changed, when, and why. LaunchDeckTwo records every shift in the audit log, with a hard 30% shift cap so no single move can reallocate more than 30% of a campaign's budget in one cycle.

Currently accepting early access
See the full pricing →